Skip to content
← All work

One screen for 'why is my bill higher?' · Vattenfall

Why is my bill higher? Answering it in one screen instead of seven.

A concept for Vattenfall's customer service agents. One workspace that explains a customer's annual settlement from their meter data and drafts a reply the agent edits and sends, with every fact linked to its source.

Self-initiated concept. Not affiliated with or endorsed by Vattenfall.

Role
Self-initiated concept, from interviews to tested prototype
Company
Vattenfall (concept)
Timeline
2025 · 6 weeks, evenings
Team
Solo, with 7 customer service agents from Dutch energy suppliers
Platforms
Internal web app for customer service agents

1One workspace in place of seven separate tools

2The draft cites meter data and stays editable

3An estimated reading is flagged before anyone replies

9:40 → 6:10

Minutes to answer a billing email, in tests

7 → 1

Tools open during a billing question

6 of 7

Agents who would use it daily

0

Drafts that can be sent without an agent's edit

The problem

Every year, energy customers get an annual settlement, and many ask why it's higher than expected. The agents I interviewed answer that question with up to seven tools open, and write the explanation from scratch each time.

What I did

I interviewed seven customer service agents from Dutch energy suppliers, mapped the questions they get most, and designed a workspace in Vattenfall's visual identity: customer context, meter data explained in plain words, and AI drafts that cite their sources and are always edited and sent by the agent.

What changed

In moderated tests with six agents, answering a billing email took 6:10 minutes instead of 9:40, and six of seven said they would use it every day. The drafts' source links were the feature they trusted most.

01 · Context

Why I picked Vattenfall.

I spent five years on energy software at Schneider Electric, mostly for building operators. I was curious about the other side: the people who explain energy bills to households. Vattenfall serves about two million customers in the Netherlands, and annual settlement season brings a wave of questions.

This is a self-initiated concept. I don't work for Vattenfall and had no access to their systems. The research is with agents from several Dutch energy suppliers, and the design follows Vattenfall's public visual identity.

Question typeShare of contactsHow long it takes today
Why is my bill higher?About a quarterThe longest by far
Change my monthly amountAbout a fifthShort
Meter reading problemsAbout one in sevenLong, often a callback
Moving houseAbout one in tenShort, mostly forms
Fig. 1The most common questions, as described by the seven agents I interviewed.

02 · Problem

Seven tools and a blank reply box.

1Pick up contact
2Find the customer
3Check the bill
4Work out why
5Write the answer
Feeling
Tools
Telephony or ticketing
CRM
Billing system
Meter data, price sheets
Email editor, templates
What hurts
No context on the caller
Several IDs for one customer
Bill shown as a PDF
Estimated readings hard to spot
Same explanation typed every day
Fig. 2An agent answering 'why is my bill higher?', reconstructed from the interviews.

The question I worked on

How might an agent get the full picture and a good first answer in one place, while staying responsible for what the customer receives?

03 · Research

Seven agents, three suppliers.

I interviewed seven agents and two team leads from three Dutch energy suppliers, recruited through LinkedIn. I also read Vattenfall's public help pages on the annual settlement and 400 public customer questions about bills on forums and review sites.

Insight 1

Most higher bills have three causes

A price change, a colder winter, or an estimated meter reading. Agents work out which one from scratch every time.

“It's almost always the same three things. I just have to prove which one.”

SamiraAgent, billing team
Insight 2

Estimated readings cause the angriest calls

Customers feel charged for nothing when a reading was estimated, and agents often spot the estimate late.

“Once you see it's an estimate, the whole call changes.”

WendyTeam lead, customer service
Insight 3

Agents want help writing, and to stay in charge

Agents were open to AI drafts, but only if they could see why the draft said what it said, and change it.

“If it writes for me, I want to check its homework.”

RubenAgent, email team

04 · Process

Six weeks, tested with the people who'd use it.

Week 0123456
Interviews
Workspace layout
Meter explainer
Drafts with sources
Tests with agents
◆ Top questions mapped◆ Prototype
Fig. 3Early 2025, alongside my job.
Option ARejected

Chatbot for customers

Bill questions are emotional and specific. In the forum posts, people wanted a person who understood their bill.

Option BTested

Templates library

Faster typing, but agents still had to find and interpret the data themselves.

Option CChosen

Workspace with explained data and drafts

The agent sees the explanation and a draft built from the customer's own data, then edits and sends it.

Fig. 4Three directions I explored and discussed with agents.

05 · Design decisions

Context first, then a draft.

A summary of the customer before the first word

When a contact comes in, the workspace shows who the customer is, what changed on their contract and what they asked before, in three lines with links to the sources. Agents in the tests stopped asking customers to repeat themselves.

Fig. 5Customer summary with the contact history behind it.

The bill explained from the meter data

The workspace compares usage with the previous year, marks estimated readings, and lists the likely causes of a higher bill in plain language. One click asks the customer for a meter photo, which settles most estimate disputes.

Fig. 6The meter explainer. Estimated months are hatched so they can't be missed.

Drafts cite their sources and are always sent by a person

The AI drafts a reply using only the customer's data and published tariffs. Every fact in the draft is highlighted and links to where it came from. Nothing is sent automatically.

  1. 01QuestionEmail, chat or call notes
  2. 02ContextContract, meter data, tariffs
  3. 03DraftFacts linked to sources
  4. 04Agent editsRequired before sending
  5. 05SentEdits feed the quality review

No draft reaches a customer without this step

Fig. 7How a drafted reply is made and checked.

Team leads see where drafts go wrong

Agents can flag a draft as wrong with one click. Team leads see how often drafts are used, how much agents change them, and every flagged draft. The numbers in this screen are illustrative.

Fig. 8The team lead's quality view, designed for the concept.

06 · Results

What the tests showed.

Six agents answered the same three billing emails twice: once with their usual tools recreated as screenshots, once with the prototype.

Usual tools ConceptLower is better
Minutes per billing email
9.7
6.2(-36%)
Times they missed the estimated reading
4
0(-100%)
Tools or tabs opened
7
1(-86%)
Fig. 9Totals and averages from six moderated sessions.

“Half the work is done when I open the email. And I can see where every number comes from.”

RubenAgent, email team

“Seeing the estimated reading straight away would calm down so many calls.”

IrisAgent, phone team
Fig. 10From the test sessions.

07 · Reflection

What I learned.

The principles were the same as in Atlas Copilot at Schneider: show the sources, keep a person in charge, and measure what people change. They worked just as well for billing emails as for building data.

Internal tools deserve the same care as customer products. Agents use them eight hours a day, and every saved click repeats thousands of times.

Tools on this project

Figma, FigJam, ProtoPie, Claude API for draft prototypes, Lookback

Names of the people quoted have been changed to protect their privacy.

Next projectZonneplan

Quoting a roof before the ladder comes out →